tmux vs zellij

tmux vs zellij: C-based multiplexer with detach/reattach versus a Rust multiplexer with floating panes, WASM plugins and a web client.

Updated

short verdict

Pick tmux (C, ISC) if you work over SSH on BSD, Solaris or Linux hosts and want a multiplexer built on detach/reattach and config files. Pick zellij (Rust, MIT) if you want floating and stacked panes, layouts, WebAssembly plugins, multiplayer sessions or a browser client without extra setup.

Both tools split one terminal into multiple panes and manage several terminal sessions from one screen. tmux is a C program that runs on OpenBSD, FreeBSD, NetBSD, Linux, macOS and Solaris and is driven by keyboard shortcuts, commands and configuration files. Zellij is a Rust program that adds floating and stacked panes, layouts, a WebAssembly plugin system and a built-in web client.

this page is for

  • Developers choosing a multiplexer for remote SSH work
  • tmux users weighing a move to floating panes and layouts
  • Teams that want shared terminal sessions
pick

tmux

★ 50.0kC
details

Better when you need a multiplexer that runs on BSD and Solaris as well as Linux and macOS, with session detach and reattach over SSH.

best for

  • Persistent sessions over SSH
  • Long-running processes on servers
  • Scripted setups via configuration files

strengths

  • Detach and reattach sessions from the same or a different terminal
  • Runs on OpenBSD, FreeBSD, NetBSD, Linux, macOS and Solaris
  • Session sharing between multiple users
  • Verbose logging modes for debugging, plus bash completion

weaknesses

  • Depends on libevent 2.x and ncurses, which a source build needs
  • No floating panes, plugin system or web client documented
  • Documented install is a source build with ./configure && make
pick

zellij

★ 35.9kRust
details

Better when you want floating panes, layouts, WASM plugins or browser access, with defaults that work immediately.

best for

  • Developers who want floating and stacked panes
  • Teams pairing in one shared session
  • Plugin authors working in languages that compile to WASM

strengths

  • Tiled, floating and stacked panes in one interface
  • Layouts automate workspace setup
  • WebAssembly plugins in any language that compiles to WASM
  • Built-in web client opens sessions in a browser without a local terminal emulator

weaknesses

  • Platform support is not documented, unlike tmux's explicit list
  • Documented install is cargo install --locked zellij, which needs a Rust toolchain

Key differences

  • Language: tmux is written in C; zellij is written in Rust.
  • License: tmux is ISC; zellij is MIT.
  • Pane model: tmux uses windows and panes; zellij adds floating and stacked panes.
  • Extensibility: tmux is scripted through configuration files; zellij supports WebAssembly plugins.
  • Access: zellij has a built-in web client; tmux documents no browser access.
  • Collaboration: zellij offers multiplayer sessions; tmux documents session sharing between users.

Choose tmux when

  • You need to run on OpenBSD, FreeBSD, NetBSD or Solaris, which tmux lists explicitly.
  • You keep long-running processes alive across SSH connections with detach and reattach.
  • You want a C program with libevent and ncurses as its only listed dependencies.
  • You prefer configuring through configuration files and keyboard commands.

Choose zellij when

  • You want floating or stacked panes alongside tiled ones.
  • You want layouts to automate workspace setup.
  • You want to write plugins in any language that compiles to WebAssembly.
  • You want to reach sessions from a browser through the built-in web client.

When not to use these

  • You only need one shell at a time and your terminal emulator already provides tabs and splits.

FAQ

Which is faster, tmux or zellij?
Neither project documents performance figures, so there is no sourced basis for calling one faster. tmux is written in C and zellij in Rust; benchmark both on your own workload.
Can I use tmux and zellij together?
Neither project documents running one inside the other. Both are terminal multiplexers covering the same job, so most people pick one.
Which is easier to configure?
Zellij states that its default configuration works immediately and offers layouts for workspace setup. tmux is scriptable through configuration files; it does not describe out-of-the-box defaults.
Does zellij or tmux support session sharing?
Both do. tmux supports session sharing between multiple users, and zellij offers multiplayer collaboration in the same terminal session.

related